Showing 4 of 4
One of the biggest problems businesses have is making basic mistakes which, to an outsider, will appear so devastatingly wrong — but from inside it simply feels like the next extension of progress. That lack of a neutral view has made many businesses go under and pay dearly.
When an outsider hears of it, it feels like a stupid mistake no one would make. But it happens more often than people like to admit.
So when making a business decision, stay neutral if possible. Not too positive, not too negative.
Each situation is different, but one way that could be useful — before locking in a decision, deliberately argue the other side of it. Write down why a neutral outsider, with no stake in the outcome, might call this a mistake. If you can't generate a real counter-argument, that's often the sign you're too close to it to see clearly.
One of the biggest problems businesses have is they do not have proper structure for their execution, governance, or even basic tasks. Things are working, so founders do not wish to touch it.
The problem with this is it's quite similar to cancer — it does not show symptoms early, and when it does, it's often too late and quite expensive.
One of the biggest evidence of this is felt when operations take on some level of scale — customers increase, employees increase, vendors increase, exposure increases — now things fall apart because there was no structure to hold all this. It worked earlier because it was for a few people, and even that can break.
So the earlier you introduce the structure and organize your business, the better it is for it.
Each situation is different, but one way that could be useful — pick the one process that would break first if you doubled your customers or team overnight, and write it down on paper before it happens. You don't need to fix everything at once. You just need to know where the first crack will show.
In small teams, work is often done with understanding and mutual sharing — and in certain ways that's good. But the problem happens when there's actually nothing else underneath it — no policy structure, no review mapping, no accountability, no decisional authority. It leads to confusion, displeasure, and imbalance in the workplace.
So working together on trust should be fine — until it becomes a means of exploitation. That's where having structure plays a crucial part.
Founders often face this at some point, but admitting it is quite hard — most things are. In small teams, when structured work is not defined, the founder becomes the direct contact for such trivial tasks. This not only takes away the founder's time but also reduces their authority. And this becomes an issue at later stages — because when the business finally introduces structure, the old freedom-based work culture has to give way, and things start happening in a more organized way. People will normally take it hard when changes are abrupt and the opposite of comfort.
So have your early team work in balance of freedom, structure, and authority to answer to.
Each situation is different, but one way that could be useful — start with just one thing: who has final say on what. Not a full policy manual, just decisional authority written down for the two or three most common points of friction. That alone removes most of the confusion before it turns into resentment.
Early-stage business ideas need to be weighed on more than one scale — not judged as simply good or bad.
Passion for the subject versus the actual likelihood of it selling. The resources spent on quality versus the market's actual readiness to pay a marginalized price. The idea's feasibility versus how much its success relies on conditions outside your control. Not wanting to see the market struggle in the space, or being too optimistic about its success.
Many founders assume their product or service will sell once it exists. But actual testing is a must — it's not a matter of skill, it's a matter of market testing, and how much friction it actually takes to sell it.
That said, no idea is wrong. You just need to be aware of the challenges it poses, and have a plan to overcome them or be ready to face them.
Each situation is different, but one way that could be useful — before building anything further, try to get one real person outside your circle to actually pay you, even a small amount, for the idea as it stands today. Not a compliment, not interest — an actual payment. That's the fastest signal for how much friction the market will really put up.
Nothing matches that combination yet — more resources are being added.